Time
S
Nick
Message
00:13 djbrooke joined #dataverse
00:19 djbrooke joined #dataverse
00:20 telnoratti joined #dataverse
00:37 iamtimmo joined #dataverse
01:10 iamtimmo joined #dataverse
01:11 iamtimmo joined #dataverse
01:58 djbrooke joined #dataverse
01:59 djbrooke joined #dataverse
02:41 iamtimmo_ joined #dataverse
03:10 axfelix joined #dataverse
06:37 djbrooke joined #dataverse
08:05 dataverse-user joined #dataverse
08:06 dataverse-user left #dataverse
10:40 djbrooke joined #dataverse
12:41 donsizemore joined #dataverse
13:35 djbrooke joined #dataverse
13:49 andrewSC joined #dataverse
14:00 michbarsinai joined #dataverse
14:38 pdurbin
donsizemore: morning. So how do we get Thu-Mai's issues in front of people? Has she considered calling in on the bi-weekly call? http://dataverse.org/community-calls
15:03 djbrooke joined #dataverse
15:06 pameyer joined #dataverse
15:20 andrewSC
hey folks
15:21 donsizemore joined #dataverse
15:23 andrewSC
touching back on the conversation yesterday regarding the ability of a user to create datasets but not publish them.. Going further back we had some discussions on possibly making a page/view where people would could publish datasets, would be allowed to see the drafts other people have made that are pending/requesting a publish
15:24 andrewSC
the folks that could publish, would review the draft then could reject or accept the draft/publish it..
15:25 andrewSC
I don't remember if it was pameyer or djbrooke or possibly donsizemore who I was speaking with about this idea of a prepub section
15:26 andrewSC
I believe there was some internal discussion on a feature like it but I never heard anything more
15:26 andrewSC
does this some vaguely familiar to anyone?
15:26 andrewSC
s/some/sound/
15:28 pameyer
not sure if this is what you're talking about - but we've been working on a workflow that's roughly: [user submits dataset for review (can't publish by themselves)] -> [curator reviews dataset, either sends it back, marks it as reviewed, or publishes it]
15:30 andrewSC
that sounds about right
15:30 andrewSC
do you guys have a timeline on that workflow? or is that still very much a work in progress?
15:38 pameyer
depending on how rigourous you want to be, it's either something you could setup with the current release; or something that's transitioning from design -> implementation
15:39 pameyer
w\ the current release, user can submit a datset for review and then edit it while it's in review
15:40 djbrooke joined #dataverse
15:51 pdurbin
andrewSC: I'm pretty sure you can already configure Dataverse this way. You give people the "Curator" or "Admin" role at the dataverse and they can see all the unpublished datasets.
15:52 pdurbin
donsizemore: did you see my message earlier?
15:58 djbrooke joined #dataverse
16:17 andrewSC
pdurbin: yeah it's definitely possible to some extent now, was just wondering if there was any progress on the other workflow
16:30 djbrooke joined #dataverse
16:39 michbarsinai joined #dataverse
16:42 pdurbin
andrewSC: I guess I don't really understand the other workflow you're proposing. And I have code to write so many you could create a GitHub issue or write to https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/dataverse-community . Maybe we just need to document better how to set up Dataverse to support the workflow you have in mind.
16:44 andrewSC
I think the workflow I'm proposing is what pameyer described at 10:28 in the chat
16:44 andrewSC
so I believe you guys are already working on it haha
16:47 pdurbin
ah, sure, "mark as reviewed" would be a new feature. some details about this at "Design Document for Publication Workflows": https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GFrCh23TdYc87dBi4xg5Pl2_Gf1usQqrqaik2-i7V7A/edit?usp=sharing
16:48 pdurbin
pameyer: I meant to put that in the notes of the last community call. whoops. these: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/dataverse-community/6Twh8KLhmQg/rR9TP-cPAQAJ
16:51 pameyer
"mark as reviewed" might be one of the parts that gets pushed back
16:51 pameyer
"don't change under the reviewers" is first up
16:52 pdurbin
pameyer: is there a GitHub issue for it?
16:53 pameyer
pdurbin: I believe so, but I'll have to look up which one
16:54 pdurbin
when you have time. thanks
17:10 michbarsinai joined #dataverse
17:11 pdurbin
If anyone happens to notice axfelix pop in here, please lemme know.
17:58 andrewSC_ joined #dataverse
18:14 donsizemore joined #dataverse
18:42 djbrooke joined #dataverse
18:53 djbrooke joined #dataverse
18:55 djbrooke joined #dataverse
18:56 iamtimmo joined #dataverse
19:03 pameyer
pdurbin: 3172 (complete with reference to earlier chat logs...)
19:04 michbarsinai joined #dataverse
19:10 pdurbin
pameyer: ah perfect. Shall we add the "SBGrid" label?
19:10 pdurbin
andrewSC_: does that issue capture what you want? https://github.com/IQSS/dataverse/issues/3172
19:11 pameyer
FYI - I'm adding a link to that from 3561 so I don't have to hunt around next time I forget where it is
20:15 michbarsinai
Well, guess whose supporting SAML and Shibboleth now: GitHub.com!
20:15 michbarsinai
https://help.github.com/articles/managing-member-identity-and-access-in-your-organization-with-saml-single-sign-on/
20:15 michbarsinai
(business plan only, BTW)
20:20 andrewSC joined #dataverse
20:21 andrewSC
pdurbin: hey sorry, just got out of a meeting. That definitely looks like it captures the workflow I had in mind!
20:23 pdurbin
andrewSC: ok. You might want to subscribe or leave a comment or give it a thumbs up or whatever
20:24 pdurbin
michbarsinai: I saw!
20:24 andrewSC
will do! :)
20:26 pdurbin
pameyer: did you say Bill wrote one of these for DataCite? https://github.com/IQSS/dataverse/tree/v4.6/src/main/java/edu/harvard/iq/dataverse/export
20:26 pameyer
pdurbin: yup
20:26 pameyer
link incoming
20:26 pdurbin
cool. where's the code?
20:26 pdurbin
you knew I'd ask :)
20:27 pameyer
https://github.com/sbgrid/sbgrid-dataverse/tree/feature/datacite-xml
20:27 pameyer
I don't think it was completely finished (other higher priorities); but finished enough that there was a button for it that showed up automaticly
20:29 pdurbin
Gotcha. I'm looking at https://github.com/sbgrid/sbgrid-dataverse/blob/098b56b531f0c3e5cad689ef39eb54d321071587/mod-sbgrid/src/main/java/edu/harvard/iq/dataverse/export/DataciteExporter.java
20:29 pdurbin
Is there an issue for this?
20:31 pdurbin
Ah, Bill already linked to this branch at https://github.com/IQSS/dataverse/issues/2917#issuecomment-270693674
20:35 pdurbin
pameyer: thanks. It was on my list to follow up with you about this.
20:35 pameyer
pdurbin: glad to help get things off your list :)
21:15 axfelix joined #dataverse
21:19 axfelix joined #dataverse
21:28 michbarsinai
@pameyer: Can I make changes to RSAL? Would that break anything?
21:28 michbarsinai
I mean, if it doesn't break anything, why bother, right?
21:40 pameyer
michbarsinai: replied through other channels; but changes to the RSAL repo won't break my production (yet)
21:40 michbarsinai
Cool. Thks.
21:41 michbarsinai
👍
22:10 donsizemore joined #dataverse
23:12 djbrooke joined #dataverse
23:50 axfelix joined #dataverse
